The UK Payments Delivery Company has launched an equity capital raise to help deliver the next generation of UK retail payments infrastructure. For PSPs and fintechs, the important question is not whether Britain is building another Visa or Mastercard, but how a new clearing and messaging layer could change access, account-to-account payments, merchant acceptance and competition.
The UK is moving from payments strategy and design towards infrastructure delivery.
The UK Payments Delivery Company (UK PDC) is the industry-led company being established to turn the UK’s plans for next-generation retail payments infrastructure into an operational system. It is not a new PSP or a new Visa or Mastercard. Its role is to lead and own the delivery of the core infrastructure that future UK payment products can use.
For PSPs and fintechs, the important question is therefore not whether Britain is building another card network. It is how the new infrastructure could change access, account-to-account payments, merchant acceptance and competition across the UK payments market.
On 15 September 2026, UK Finance announced that UK PDC had launched an equity capital raise, giving eligible organisations across the payments ecosystem an opportunity to invest in the company.
UK Finance says 19 organisations supported the programme during its mobilisation phase. The new capital will support UK PDC as the programme moves towards incorporation and delivery.
Sky News reports that the initial raise is expected to be around £50 million. The £50 million figure should therefore be treated as a reported fundraising target rather than an amount officially disclosed by UK Finance.
But the significance of the UK PDC goes beyond the fundraising.
What is the UK PDC actually being built to deliver?
UK PDC is being established to lead and own delivery of the UK’s next-generation core retail payments infrastructure.
The high-level design is being developed through the Retail Payments Infrastructure Board (RPIB), chaired by the Bank of England. Once that design is developed, UK PDC is expected to take it forward into delivery.
The key term here is core infrastructure.
HM Treasury describes the proposed model as a shared clearing and messaging layer. In practical terms, this is the infrastructure used to exchange payment information and determine obligations between participants before settlement.
That is different from a customer-facing payment product. The infrastructure sits underneath payment products. Banks, PSPs and fintechs can then provide payment journeys and services on top of it.
For B2B payments companies, that distinction is fundamental.
Why the architecture matters to PSPs
The proposed model separates common infrastructure from the competitive product layer.
HM Treasury’s framework distinguishes between the core infrastructure, the scheme governing that infrastructure and product-level arrangements used to make specific payment products work across multiple providers.
Those product-level arrangements can cover much of what determines whether a payment method works commercially in practice, including payment initiation, consumer protection, dispute resolution, liability, merchant acceptance and commercial models.
This means the UK’s infrastructure programme is not simply a technology-modernisation project. It is also about defining where shared infrastructure ends and competition between payment products begins.
For PSPs, the eventual value of the new infrastructure will therefore depend on more than technical connectivity. Access conditions, scheme standards, settlement arrangements, fraud responsibilities, interoperability and the economics of individual payment products will all matter.
A2A at checkout is the clearest test case
One of the most important potential use cases is account-to-account (A2A) payments at the point of sale.
The Bank of England describes A2A at checkout as an additional option to card payments rather than as a replacement for cards. The future infrastructure is also intended to support other existing and emerging payment journeys.
That distinction matters. The UK already has Faster Payments and an established Open Banking ecosystem. The bigger challenge is turning an account-to-account transfer into a payment product that can work consistently for merchants and consumers at scale.
Merchant payments need more than payment initiation. They need predictable transaction states, fraud controls, refunds, reconciliation, dispute handling, liability rules and a commercial model that works across the participants involved.
HM Treasury’s proposed product-level framework explicitly covers many of these areas. For PSPs and fintechs, much of the commercial opportunity — and complexity — will therefore sit above the underlying rail.
What could change for merchants?
For merchants, A2A could eventually become another payment option alongside cards and other payment methods.
But the business case will depend on how the product is implemented. Merchants will need to understand the total cost of acceptance, settlement behaviour, refund flows, fraud exposure, reconciliation and how consistently the payment method works across banks and PSPs.
A new payment rail does not automatically create a better or cheaper merchant payment product. Similarly, faster movement of funds does not by itself solve disputes, fraud or operational exceptions.
The rules and services built around the infrastructure will therefore matter as much as the infrastructure itself.
What should PSPs and fintechs watch?
One of the most important issues will be access. The UK’s stated direction is towards fair, transparent and non-discriminatory access to the future infrastructure. At the same time, participation will be subject to standards covering areas such as access, settlement, resilience, risk management and governance.
This means there could be different ways for PSPs to participate. Some firms may access the core infrastructure more directly. Others may reach new payment products through banks, other participants or intermediaries. The commercial and technical implications of those models could be very different.
Interoperability is another major issue. If an A2A payment product is offered by multiple PSPs and banks, merchants and consumers will expect it to operate consistently regardless of which provider is involved.
HM Treasury notes that common product-level arrangements may be needed to ensure that payment products work reliably and at scale across multiple providers. For payment technology companies, that makes standardisation at the product layer almost as important as standardisation in the core infrastructure.
Is Britain building an alternative to Visa and Mastercard?
This is where some of the recent headlines need qualification.
Sky News reports that the infrastructure could ultimately evolve into a domestic alternative to Mastercard and Visa. That is a possible longer-term direction reported by the media, not the way the project is currently defined by the official bodies responsible for it.
The Bank of England describes UK PDC as the company that will lead and own delivery of the new core infrastructure. It describes A2A payments at the point of sale as an additional option to card payments.
So the more useful B2B interpretation is not that the UK is creating another Visa or Mastercard. It is that the UK is developing infrastructure intended to support more choice and competition between payment products.
If A2A payments eventually become a credible option for more merchant transactions, they could compete with card-based acceptance in some use cases without reproducing the entire card-network model.
What UK PDC could change — and what remains open
UK PDC moves the programme closer to delivery, but important commercial and technical questions are still open.
The high-level design of the core infrastructure is still being developed. Access models, scheme arrangements, product rules, fraud responsibilities, pricing and merchant adoption will continue to determine what the changes mean in practice.
Existing UK payment systems are also not disappearing immediately. The Bank of England says Faster Payments, Bacs and the Image Clearing System will continue to operate while the next-generation infrastructure is developed.
For PSPs and fintechs, the immediate takeaway is therefore not to prepare for a sudden replacement of today’s payment rails. The more important development is the changing relationship between infrastructure, scheme rules and payment products.
That will influence who can participate, how new payment services can be delivered and where PSPs can create value.
The B2B opportunity is above the rail
The UK’s new infrastructure could eventually make it easier to support more payment products on common underlying capabilities.
But merchants will still need those products to be integrated and operated. PSPs will still need to manage merchant onboarding, payment processing, fraud and risk controls, reconciliation, reporting and operational exceptions. Businesses operating across markets will continue to work with cards, bank payments, alternative payment methods and multiple provider relationships.
That is also where the development becomes relevant to payment platforms such as Payneteasy. As payment ecosystems become more diverse, PSPs and merchants need a consistent payment orchestration layer across different payment connections. The purpose of that layer is not to replace the underlying rails, but to simplify multiple payment gateway integration and make different provider and payment relationships easier to manage.
The most important question around UK PDC is therefore not whether it becomes Britain’s answer to Visa and Mastercard. It is what PSPs and fintechs will be able to build once the UK’s core retail payments infrastructure changes underneath them.
PSP
Offer your customers a top-level payment solution, increase your turnover and boost your business profit.
Merchants
Only one integration to consolidate all your payment providers to a unified management system.
Contact author
