Payment Orchestration Platform
Unify all your PSPs into one platform. Smart routing, automatic failover, and real-time analytics to maximize approval rates.
Meet us at conferences around the world
SBC Summit Lisbon
SiGMA Europe
Embedded payments refer to the integration of payment processing capabilities directly into software platforms, applications, and digital experiences. Rather than redirecting users to an external payment gateway or checkout page, embedded payments make the transaction a seamless part of the platform's native workflow. This approach transforms non-financial software into a payment-enabled platform, creating new revenue streams while improving the end-user experience.
Embedded payments rely on APIs and other integration components that allow software platforms to incorporate payment functionality without building the underlying financial infrastructure from scratch.
The architecture consists of three layers: the platform's user interface (where the payment experience lives), the payment orchestration layer (which handles routing, risk assessment, and compliance), and the processing layer (which connects to acquirers and card networks). Modern embedded payment platforms abstract the complexity of the bottom two layers, exposing APIs that platform developers can use to integrate payment functionality.
In a typical embedded payment flow, the customer interacts with the platform's native interface — placing an order, booking a service, or subscribing to a plan. Transaction status information can be returned to the platform through server callbacks depending on the endpoint and integration configuration.
For marketplace and multi-seller platforms, embedded payments include sub-merchant onboarding APIs. The platform can register new sellers, perform automated KYC verification, and enable payment acceptance — all without the seller needing to interact with the payment provider directly. Settlement is split automatically between the platform (which takes its fee) and the sub-merchant.
Understanding the spectrum from basic payment integration to fully embedded payments helps platforms choose the right approach:
| Aspect | Redirect (Basic) | iFrame/Hosted Fields | Fully Embedded |
|---|---|---|---|
| User Experience | Leaves platform for payment | Stays on platform, some visual gaps | Seamless, native feel |
| Branding Control | Limited to payment page theme | Moderate customization | Full white-label control |
| Conversion Rate | Lowest (redirect friction) | Moderate improvement | Highest (no context switch) |
| PCI Scope | SAQ-A (minimal) | SAQ-A (minimal) | SAQ-A-EP or SAQ-D |
| PSD2/SCA (Europe) | SCA handled by PSP; 3DS2 challenge built into hosted page automatically | PSP manages 3DS2 flow; platform may pass exemption flags (MIT, low-value, TRA) | 3DS2/SCA handling depends on the PSP, acquirer, and selected integration model; supported authentication and exemption parameters may be passed where applicable. |
| Development Effort | Hours | Days | Weeks (with modern APIs) |
| Revenue Potential | None (referral only) | Limited markup | Full payment monetization |
Embedded payments create value for both the platform operator and the businesses using it:
Payment monetization: Platforms can make payment processing part of their commercial model instead of relying only on software subscription or licensing revenue.
Higher product stickiness: When payment operations are integrated into the same system used to run the business, moving to another platform may also require migrating payment workflows, integrations, and operational processes.
Connected payment and product data: Payment information can be analyzed alongside the platform’s own operational data, giving businesses a more unified view of transactions, revenue, customer activity, and payment performance.
Unified experience: merchants manage their business and payments in one place. No separate logins, dashboards, or reconciliation between systems. This reduces operational overhead and error rates.
Faster onboarding: through the payment facilitator model underlying most embedded payment implementations, merchants can start accepting payments immediately without separate bank applications.
Different industries implement embedded payments in ways that match their specific workflow requirements.
Vertical SaaS companies embed recurring payment processing into the software their customers already use. A restaurant management platform can add payment acceptance directly to its POS interface, while a property management platform can integrate rent collection and tenant payouts.
The platform handles the payment infrastructure while the end merchant continues working inside the same software environment.
Two-sided marketplaces embed payments to manage buyer-to-seller transactions, payouts, transaction status updates, and reconciliation.
The platform coordinates payment collection from buyers and the movement of funds to sellers according to its business model. This often requires reliable payment routing, transaction monitoring, and support for multiple payment flows.
E-commerce platforms can embed checkout, saved payment methods, recurring payments, and subscription billing directly into merchant storefronts.
Instead of integrating a separate payment stack from scratch, merchants access payment functionality through the commerce platform they already use.
An embedded payments API is the technical layer connecting a software platform with its payment infrastructure.
For an engineering team, the practical question is not only whether payments can be embedded, but what needs to be built and maintained around them: API calls, authentication, sandbox testing, card-data handling, transaction status updates, callbacks, and error processing.
These are the main areas to evaluate before moving an embedded payments API integration into production.
Payneteasy provides separate sandbox and production environments for integration and testing.
The sandbox allows development teams to test transaction flows and integration logic before switching to live production endpoints and credentials.
Testing should cover the payment lifecycle relevant to the implementation, including successful transactions, declined transactions, 3-D Secure scenarios, callbacks, and error handling.
Payment integrations use API operations that correspond to the payment flows required by a particular implementation. The exact set of supported operations depends on the specific integration. Common operations include:
Requests include a client_orderid, which is the unique order identifier assigned by the integrating platform. It gives the merchant or platform a consistent reference for matching internal orders with transactions processed through the gateway.
client_orderid should not be treated as a universal idempotency key unless that behaviour is explicitly documented for the relevant API method.
Payneteasy supports several request-authentication mechanisms depending on the API endpoint and version.
These include SHA-1 request signatures, OAuth HMAC-SHA1, and OAuth RSA-SHA256.
For RSA-based authentication, the client generates a private and public key pair. The private key remains on the client side, while the public key is used by Payneteasy to verify signed requests.
The authentication method therefore needs to be selected according to the specific API operation and integration version rather than assuming one universal authentication scheme across all endpoints.
How card data is collected has a direct impact on the security architecture and PCI DSS scope of an embedded payments implementation.
Hosted payment forms and card-reference or tokenization mechanisms can keep raw payment-card data away from the platform's own application servers. The platform can then work with a payment reference or token instead of storing or processing the original PAN directly.
This can significantly reduce PCI DSS scope compared with a direct server-to-server card-data integration.
The exact PCI DSS requirements and applicable SAQ depend on the implementation model, including how payment fields are hosted, how the browser flow is constructed, and whether cardholder data ever enters the platform's systems.
Payment processing is asynchronous. A transaction may change state after the original API request has already returned.
Payneteasy can use server callbacks, often referred to as webhooks, to send transaction information back to the integrating platform. Depending on the specific integration and endpoint configuration, the merchant may receive only a single callback for a transaction. If the transaction status changes afterward, an additional callback may not be triggered automatically. In some configurations, the status must be updated manually, after which a callback can be sent automatically or manually.
Callbacks include a control checksum that the receiving application can validate before processing the notification.
Because the same callback may be received more than once as a result of network or delivery conditions, the receiving system should also protect against duplicate processing by checking transaction attributes such as status, transaction type, orderid, and client_orderid.
This duplicate-handling logic should be implemented on the platform side rather than assuming every callback will be delivered exactly once.
Declines and processing errors are part of the normal payment flow and should be handled explicitly in the integration.
Payneteasy API responses can return error codes together with human-readable error messages.
The integrating platform can use these responses to identify unsuccessful transactions, display an appropriate message to the user, and determine the next action.
Retry logic should be based on the documented error and transaction response rather than assuming that every failed payment can safely be retried.
Payneteasy provides API documentation covering request parameters, response formats, authentication, callbacks, redirects, and common integration scenarios.
The API is also available through an OpenAPI 3.1 specification.
Payneteasy does not provide official language-specific client SDKs. Instead, development teams can use the OpenAPI specification to generate client code in their preferred programming language, import the API into tools such as Postman or Insomnia, and use it with modern development and coding tools.
This keeps the integration language-independent while reducing the amount of client-side API boilerplate teams need to create manually.
Payneteasy's technology gateway platform provides payment-processing infrastructure for software platforms building embedded payment experiences and connecting them with acquiring banks and payment networks.
Depending on the integration being implemented, the platform can provide capabilities including:
For teams evaluating an embedded payments architecture, the next step is to map the required payment flows against the Payneteasy integration options and API methods available for the intended setup.
Review the API documentation to evaluate the technical integration, or contact Payneteasy to discuss the payment flows, acquiring relationships, and configuration required for your platform.
Thank you for reaching us. Your request has been sent successfully. We will get back to you as soon as possible.
Message was not sent